OPINION: Matthew O’Toole’s pro-Belfast Agreement piece in the Irish Times is factually incorrect

OPINION: Matthew O’Toole’s pro-Belfast Agreement piece in the Irish Times is factually incorrect

By Jamie Bryson

The Irish Times have today published an article by Matthew O’Toole, the former chief press officer for Europe and economic affairs in the prime minister’s office. In it he falsely claims that the Belfast Agreement constitutionally binds the United Kingdom to Europe. You can read it HERE

Join over thousands of readers who are receiving our newsletter and being kept up to date with the latest news from the community
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

In this piece Mr O’Toole appears to assert that the Belfast Agreement ‘smudged the boundaries’ between nation states. This, naturally, would lead the writer to conclude that there is some ambiguity about the status of the Northern Ireland border. This confusion is fed by the all-things-to-all-people nature of the perverse Belfast Agreement, but even that morally reprehensible capitulation to republican terrorism is remarkably clear on the question of sovereignty.

In Section 5 (6) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 it is clear that British Parliamentary sovereignty is fully retained. This is one part of the agreement that is remarkably clear and concise. This power would also allow Parliament to withdraw from the British-Irish treaty underpinning the Belfast Agreement, and repeal the Northern Ireland Act 1998, if it so desired.

I personally believe that Unionism should deploy the leverage currently available and become persuaders for a repeal the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and withdrawal from the British-Irish treaty, especially in light of the increasingly aggressive Irish Government attempts to undermine the sovereignty of Northern Ireland.

This, in my view, is the solution to the somewhat contradictory commitments made by the British Government. The Belfast Agreement makes committments in relation to North-South co-operation, which appears to have been further emboldened by paragraph 49 of the UK-EU ‘deal’. The Belfast Agreement, and paragraph 49 of the monstrous UK-EU ‘deal’ are then completely contradicted by  paragraph 50 of the same deal, which makes clear that there will be no internal borders within the United Kingdom.

Full regulatory alignment between Northern Ireland the Republic of Ireland would, by necessity, cause there to be regulatory divergence between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom. This would be constitutionally absurd and lead to a def-facto economic united Ireland. Unless, of course, the ultimate plan is to completely betray the will of the British people by keeping the entirety of the United Kingdom within the Customs Union and Single Market.

However, the circle of constitutional contradictions could be squared, as aforementioned, by quite simply tearing up the Belfast Agreement. It has failed and will continue to fail. Withdraw from the British-Irish treaty underpinning the agreement and, by a majority in Parliament, repeal the Northern Ireland Act 1998.

The Belfast Agreement is one of the greatest threats to the constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom that we are ever likely to see. It has provided an all-Ireland dynamic that is fed by a continuing concession meter, designed to ease Northern Ireland, by stealth, into Dublin rule.

It is in this context that Irish Government have sought, as many anti-agreement unionists always warned they would, to use the Belfast Agreement as a Trojan horse, forcing Irish unity via the backdoor. Their latest contribution is to suggest some kind of ‘joint authority’ in the absence of an Executive. This ludicrous proposal only emboldens the wreckers of Sinn Fein. Why would they go back into the Northern Ireland Executive when the Irish Government is dangling the carrot of joint authority- a key republican staging post- as a reward for their intransigence?

There will be no joint authority over Northern Ireland. This has already been made clear by the UK Government, but apparently no matter how many times it is said, the Irish Government and nationalism refuses to hear it. Again, another reason why the Belfast Agreement needs to go in the bin.

The general point put forward by Mr O’Toole, and reflected in the headline, is that the Belfast Agreement binds the UK to Europe in regards to Northern Ireland. This is quite plainly factually incorrect. This very point, and indeed almost every conceivable variation of it, was tested in McCord’s (Raymond) Application [2016] NIQB 85. The Northern Ireland High Court dismissed this challenge on all grounds.

Whilst many parts of the judgement expressly refute the assertions put forward by Mr O’Toole, it is perhaps most succinctly dismissed in paragraph 152, which states the following;

“The court is not aware of any specific provision in the Good Friday Agreement or in the 1998 Act which confirms the existence of the limitation which the applicant contends for and which establishes a norm that any change to the constitutional arrangements for the government of Northern Ireland and, in particular, withdrawal by the United Kingdom from the EU, can only be effected with the consent of the people of Northern Ireland.  Nor can the court identify material which would cause it to imply any such limitation.  This is not, in the court’s estimation, surprising as if such a limitation exists, it would be reasonable to have expected this to have been highlighted in the run up to the referendum held in June of this year.  The proposition for which the applicant contends would, it seems, have the most unusual result of requiring a second referendum on the issue of EU membership to be held in Northern Ireland within a short time of the people of Northern Ireland having gone to the polls in respect of the same issue in a national referendum where the national outcome was in favour of withdrawal.”

There is quite simply nothing in the Belfast Agreement that binds the UK to Europe. Therefore the whole premise of the piece by Mr O’Toole falls apart, especially in light of this matter already being adjudicated upon by the High Court.

Whilst the whole basis of the piece is inherently flawed, it does helpfully shine a light on the contradictory nature of the iniquitous Belfast Agreement. This, one would hope, may go some way to strengthening the argument for repealing the Northern Ireland Act 1998.

Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Unionist Voice than ever but unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can.

The Unionist Voice is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

f everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Unionist Voice– and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Support Us

22 Responses to "OPINION: Matthew O’Toole’s pro-Belfast Agreement piece in the Irish Times is factually incorrect"

  1. Like  September 12, 2018 at 12:04 pm

    Like!! Great article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  2. เพิ่มไลค์เพจ  September 13, 2018 at 12:04 pm

    Likely I am likely to save your blog post. 🙂

  3. minecraft  October 4, 2018 at 7:19 am

    Hi to every , because I am genuinely keen of reading this weblog’s
    post to be updated regularly. It carries pleasant data.

  4. minecraft  October 4, 2018 at 8:22 am

    What’s up to every body, it’s my first visit of this weblog;
    this web site contains remarkable and truly good material for visitors.

  5. minecraft  October 5, 2018 at 5:10 pm

    I blog often and I genuinely thank you for your information. Your
    article has truly peaked my interest. I am going to book mark
    your site and keep checking for new information about once per week.

    I opted in for your Feed too.

  6. minecraft  October 6, 2018 at 2:16 am

    Really when someone doesn’t understand then its
    up to other viewers that they will help, so here it takes place.

  7. minecraft  October 6, 2018 at 2:10 pm

    This is really interesting, You are a very skilled
    blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more
    of your wonderful post. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks!

  8. minecraft  October 7, 2018 at 3:34 am

    Everything typed was very reasonable. But, think on this, suppose you were to write a
    awesome headline? I am not suggesting your information is not solid., however suppose you added a headline that grabbed a person’s
    attention? I mean OPINION: Matthew O’Toole’s pro-Belfast Agreement piece in the Irish Times is factually
    incorrect | Unionist Voice is kinda vanilla. You might glance at Yahoo’s home page and
    see how they write news headlines to get people to click.
    You might add a related video or a pic or two to grab
    readers interested about what you’ve written.
    Just my opinion, it could make your posts a little bit more interesting.

  9. minecraft free download 2018  October 8, 2018 at 2:05 pm

    I quite like looking through a post that can make men and women think.
    Also, thank you for allowing me to comment!

  10. minecraft free download 2018  October 8, 2018 at 3:52 pm

    Wonderful blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?

    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!
    Thank you

  11. minecraft free download 2018  October 8, 2018 at 6:55 pm

    Wow, this paragraph is good, my younger sister is analyzing these things, so I am going to convey

  12. minecraft free download 2018  October 9, 2018 at 11:41 pm

    Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you could do with a few pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is wonderful blog.

    An excellent read. I will definitely be back.

  13. minecraft free download 2018  October 10, 2018 at 7:31 am

    Hello friends, fastidious article and good urging commented at this
    place, I am truly enjoying by these.

  14. ปั้มไลค์  October 11, 2018 at 11:47 am

    I believe you have noted some very interesting details, thankyou for the post. 🙂

  15. Billy Galway  October 12, 2018 at 10:21 pm

    That is the precise weblog for anybody who wants to search out out about this topic. You understand so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I truly would need…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, just great!

  16. Bryce Johson  October 13, 2018 at 5:12 pm

    Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!

  17. Thao Vanhorn  October 14, 2018 at 11:27 am

    Top-notch information it is really. I’ve been awaiting for this information.

  18. minecraft secret free download  October 18, 2018 at 11:00 pm

    Having read this I thought it was really enlightening.
    I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this informative article
    together. I once again find myself spending a lot of time both
    reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still
    worth it!

  19. Ima Flipp  October 19, 2018 at 2:29 pm

    I think other web-site proprietors should take this site as an model, very clean and magnificent user genial style and design, let alone the content. You’re an expert in this topic!

  20. Domonique Deida  October 20, 2018 at 1:22 pm

    Awsome post and right to the point. I don’t know if this is really the best place to ask but do you guys have any ideea where to hire some professional writers? Thx 🙂

  21. Nicky Arave  October 21, 2018 at 9:05 am

    As a Newbie, I am constantly browsing online for articles that can help me. Thank you

  22. Benefits of Coconut Oil  October 22, 2018 at 11:42 pm

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted
    to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing to your feed
    and I hope you write again soon!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.