Treacherous amendment to the NI Act shreds the requirement for cross community consent on pernicious Protocol

The Secretary of State has quietly amended the Belfast Agreement to shred the cross community consent mechanism when it comes to protecting unionist interests on the pernicious Protocol. This change- without any unionist consent- was delivered as a reward for nationalist threats of violence.

Treacherous amendment to the NI Act shreds the requirement for cross community consent on pernicious Protocol

By Jamie Bryson

On 10 December 2020 the Secretary of State Brandon Lewis quietly laid a piece of legislation in the form of a Statutory instrument which unilaterally amended the Belfast Agreement. The treacherous amendment- without any unionist consent- inserted Schedule 6A into the Northern Ireland Act which at paragraph 18 (5) disapplied Section 42 of the Act for the vote on the Protocol.

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
Join over thousands of readers who are receiving our newsletter and being kept up to date with the latest news from the community
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Section 42 was inserted to give effect to Strand 1 (5) (d) of the Belfast Agreement which made clear that as a key safeguard- for both communities- key votes would require cross community consent. This was a key strand for the Belfast Agreement, demanded by nationalists who were in a minority within the Assembly.

For over four years during the Brexit negotiations, we were lectured day and daily by pan nationalism. The enlightened liberal elite, academia, and media establishment presented the Belfast Agreement as sacrosanct which almost amounted to a holy writ. We were told that ‘peace’ depended upon the agreement being protected “in all its parts”.

We were told that peace would be at risk if nationalism did not get their own way; if there was so much as a camera on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. In other words; the threat of violence was deployed to gain political leverage.

However, as soon as pan nationalism (SF/SDLP/Alliance) had a majority to impose an economic United Ireland, these defenders of the agreement were more than happy- indeed championed- the destruction of cross community consent when it came to the imposition of the Protocol.

This illuminates the reality; protecting the Belfast Agreement really means protecting nationalism’s interests. There is no issue with breaching the safeguards in the Belfast Agreement so long as it is to the detriment of unionists.

Imagine, for just one moment, that the Belfast Agreement was amended to the detriment of nationalism without the consent of a single nationalist elected representative; entirely against their interests. Perhaps setting a criteria for a border poll that requires a 75% majority. The great and the good would be up in arms; there would chaos and wailing in the street.

Despite this incredible development, which was revealed by this writer on Sunday 24 January after the Statutory Instrument was spotted, the leader of the DUP has not said a single world about this breach of the Belfast Agreement.

This flagrant breach of the agreement raises a salient question; given the Belfast Agreement safeguards only apply to nationalists, why would any self respecting unionist continue to operate and/or support the institutions flowing from the Belfast Agreement?


Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Unionist Voice than ever but unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can.

The Unionist Voice is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

f everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Unionist Voice– and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Support Us