Every genuine loyalist should take issue with a politically contrived Task Force designed to fund ‘good loyalists’ and criminalise ‘bad loyalists’
The pursuit of individuals involved in crime is to be welcomed by all right thinking persons. We must all aspire to a society whereby the rule of law is upheld, and those that breach the law are dealt with via a robust policing and justice system. No genuine loyalist could have any problem with that.
However, many genuine loyalists across the province have very legitimate and well grounded concerns about the work of the Paramilitary Crime Task Force (PCTF). The issue is that this is not really about pursuing crime, but rather the reality is that an illusion of pursuing crime is being used as a cover to bolster those seen as ‘progressive’ and ‘peace process’ compliant loyalists, by isolating and criminalising those whose political views are inconvenient.
The PCTF are the stick that runs in parallel to former ACC Peter Sheridan’s Co-Operation Ireland, which delivers the carrot to those who follow a roadmap drawn up by a politically motivated consortium. And like every carrot and stick, if one chooses the carrot then the stick is kept behind the back. It is therefore impossible that the PCTF will pursue and hold everyone equally subject to the law, because their objectives are framed by the work of Peter Sheridan’s consortium, and it is they who will advise the PCTF on who is chewing on the carrot, and who needs the stick.
This is the epitome of political policing, where objectives are prioritised based upon political expediency. It is all about creating good loyalists, and bad loyalists. The good loyalists will be promised lavish funding by Peter Sheridan’s consortium, whilst the bad loyalists will be relentlessly pursued by the PCTF. The division between the ‘good loyalists’ and the ‘bad loyalists’ isn’t a division between those who are involved in crime and those who aren’t, but rather a division between who is politically compliant and who isn’t.
It is patently obvious that the Government agenda for moving forward is- by political ‘Fresh Start’ design- to foster division within loyalism by, as aforementioned, creating ‘good loyalists’ and ‘bad loyalists’. This is done under the guise of ‘eradicating crime’, but in reality it is about breaking down the cohesion and political resistance of the loyalist community. That is the real agenda at play.
If individuals are involved in crime, then pursue those individuals. But pursue all individuals involved in crime equally and in proportion. Do not allow policing priorities to be shaped by political events. Everyone must be equal under the law, and equally subject to the law.
The parallel process was always the contradiction at the heart of the Fresh Start agreement, an uneasy entwining of politics and policing in the form of a funding carrot for political compliance on one hand, and a stick for those who are politically inconvenient on the other.
Everyone within loyalism is wholly committed to peace, but there are many who are increasingly uneasy about the ‘process’. This is a legitimate and lawful position to hold, it is not a crime to lawfully and peacefully object to political decisions or policies.
Are the good loyalists the ones that engage in statutory led bonfire schemes, that meet with the PSNI to assist them in ‘community policing’ and that support the Belfast Agreement?
Conversely are the bad loyalists those who lawfully and legitimately oppose the outworkings of the one sided Belfast Agreement, who do not want to engage in statutory led schemes designed to eradicate every vestige of unionist culture and who have grave, and legitimate, concerns about political policing?
Is that where we are at? Where the PSNI and a consortium of unelected individuals decide who is a ‘good loyalist’ and who is a ‘bad loyalist’?
Every genuine loyalist should be uneasy at anyone giving carte blanche to the Task Force. This is the same PCTF that raided people’s homes searching for UVF memorabilia, and then displayed badges and legal flags as if they had seized illegal material. It was only after the East Belfast Community Initiative repeatedly raised this absurdity, and Kate Hoey MP challenged the Chief Constable, that the PSNI had to back off from obtaining search warrants to raid homes looking for materials that they eventually had to concede were not even illegal. Should we give full support to the PCTF, even when they are engaged in such legally dubious and politically motivated activity?
Everyone should support the PSNI in pursuing all individuals involved in crime, that is the very basis of the rule of law. That is quite different than supporting the work of a Task Force set up by virtue of a political agreement, which is driven by political considerations and most worryingly of all, which sets its objectives and priorities based upon whether an unelected ‘consortium’ come to the conclusion that a carrot, or a stick, is required.
Since you’re here…
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Unionist Voice than ever but unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can.
The Unionist Voice is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.
f everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Unionist Voice– and it only takes a minute. Thank you.